Post by account_disabled on Dec 24, 2023 5:41:26 GMT -4
Chief Financial Officer. This necessarily affects the quantity of content. The more content a profile has, the more likely it is to contain the 7 keywords (on average) searched by a recruiter. In fact, this is what LinkedIn says in its assistance: “If you include an extensive list of keywords in your profile, you can appear in a large number of searches” ( . ATTENTION LinkedIn specifies that you should not try to make yourself visible on keywords corresponding to skills that you do not possess: “The question you should ask yourself, however, is whether other members consider your profile to be relevant for their research”.
LinkedIn states that keyword stuffing and repetition are not good practices. Beyond Email Data not being a good practice, it is totally ineffective. Jason S. is known for having put the same keyword in his profile more than 500 times. However, he is completely invisible on this skill. Indeed, on LinkedIn, location matters more (much more) than repetition. LinkedIn reminds us that having a complete profile is essential: “Not only does a complete profile help you appear in more searches, but it also improves how you are matched in our system.” To have a complete profile (absolute expert), you need: photo / location / sector of activity / summary / current position with a description / 2 previous positions / training / at least 5 skills / at least 50 contacts.
Several of these criteria in the complete profile correspond to advertising targeting criteria. Surprising, right? Would LinkedIn consider a complete profile to be a profile suitable for advertising targeting? Go crazy with skills (you can put 50), but even if you can put free text skills, don't. The skills section is only there to respond to the skills section offered in LinkedIn Recruiter. So limit yourself to the skills listed by LinkedIn. LinkedIn confirms that network size is essential. Even though they tell you to only connect with those you know, LinkedIn is very clear: “the more connections you have, the more likely you are to be connected to the person searching.
LinkedIn states that keyword stuffing and repetition are not good practices. Beyond Email Data not being a good practice, it is totally ineffective. Jason S. is known for having put the same keyword in his profile more than 500 times. However, he is completely invisible on this skill. Indeed, on LinkedIn, location matters more (much more) than repetition. LinkedIn reminds us that having a complete profile is essential: “Not only does a complete profile help you appear in more searches, but it also improves how you are matched in our system.” To have a complete profile (absolute expert), you need: photo / location / sector of activity / summary / current position with a description / 2 previous positions / training / at least 5 skills / at least 50 contacts.
Several of these criteria in the complete profile correspond to advertising targeting criteria. Surprising, right? Would LinkedIn consider a complete profile to be a profile suitable for advertising targeting? Go crazy with skills (you can put 50), but even if you can put free text skills, don't. The skills section is only there to respond to the skills section offered in LinkedIn Recruiter. So limit yourself to the skills listed by LinkedIn. LinkedIn confirms that network size is essential. Even though they tell you to only connect with those you know, LinkedIn is very clear: “the more connections you have, the more likely you are to be connected to the person searching.